Category: Events-reports

Liberal forum for political dialogue: freedom of the press and the fight against fake news in the digital age

El Hadj Kasse, member of the Bridge Tank’s board, was one of the keynote speakers of the Liberal Forum of Political Dialogue dedicated to the freedom of the press and the fight against fake news during the digital age. This event took place on the 7th of December 2020 in Dakar, Senegal. 

Among the other keynote speakers were Seydou Gueye, Spokesperson and Communications Coordinator for the presidency of the Republic, Mamadou Ibra Kane, Director General of the Future Media Group, and Mame Less Camara, Director of Information for the Future Media group.

Conference: being a social democrat in Africa

Martin Ziguélé, former Prime Minister of the Central African Republic, took part in the Bridge Tank’s conversation about being social democrat in Africa. He discussed with Joël Ruet and Stéphane Gompertz, former French Ambassador to Austria and Ethiopia and Africa Director at the Quai d’Orsay, about various subjects, including social justice, public finances, COVID-19 and Russia. Martin Ziguélé highlighted his political and financial experiences and how these would be an advantage to run for the presidency. He also underlined how important the fight against corruption was to him. He also mentioned the need for his country to develop and invest in education, especially after higher education, as well as secure the possession of fire weapons. Martin Ziguélé also called for more communication between African states, so that the voices of smaller or less economically developed countries can still be heard. He eventually called for the respect of the rule limiting the number of presidential mandates in other African states. This talk took place on the 17th of November 2020.

The Bridge Talks: 2020 US election

Jean-Claude Beaujour, lawyer and Vice-President of the France-Americas Foundation, took part in the Bridge Tank’s conversation about the 2020 American presidential election. He discussed with Joël Ruet about the American political system and its relation with a growingly divided society. Jean-Claude Beaujour highlighted the important role of economic wealth, religion, as well as the distinction between urban and rural areas, in the social and ideological division of the American society, which is also reflected by the split between the moderates and the Trump followers among the Republicans. This talk took place on the 7th of November 2020.

The Bridge Tank organises a panel on greening investment in the EU and China & challenges of the Belt & Road Initiative

The news on sustainable development is dominated by the initiative announced at the 75th anniversary of the UN by Xi Jinping to be carbon neutral by 2060. The AIIB has decided to stop financing coal. The Chinese government aims to pass the carbon emission peak before 2030 but 80% of primary energy in China is carbon-based, representing 27% of global GHG emissions. In light of these recent developments, Edmond Alphandéry, Pierre-Noël Giraud, Song Luzheng and Djellil Bouzidi discussed the economic instruments of a possible EU-China cooperation in this field in a panel chaired by our board member Philippe Coste.

Philippe Coste recalled that for the time being, many coal-fired power plant projects are being built in China. However, the combination of China’s desire to pass the carbon emission peak before 2030 and the launch by Europe of its green plan in connection with the recovery plan provides a very good basis for cooperation, provided that the ways of effectively exploiting it are identified.

Edmond Alphandéry pushed for a carbon price tool. In Europe, a coalition of finance ministers has been set up in this direction: it is a market-based, decentralised solution that encourages the production of non-carbon energies. In Europe, 45% of emissions are subject to the ETS market. This mechanism retains the problem of volatility. To maintain its power as a price signal, the price of emission allowances must be predictable and stable over the long term, and Edmond Alphandery has set up a task force to convince the European authorities to target carbon prices rather than emission volumes.

China is absolutely key in the fight against climate change. It has realised this and set up a carbon market. Within the International Finance Forum, we are leading a joint initiative between leading Chinese and European figures towards a common strategy for a convergent carbon price. The idea is spreading in China.

Pierre-Noël Giraud also insists on the role of politics and civil society, arguing that banks have no interest in getting involved because of the liquidity of financial markets. The failure of green bonds is also obvious as they only yield 8 basis points.

Djellil Bouzidi fully shares this view on green bonds. Zero and negative rates are the enemy. The investment costs do not vary and the energy intensity of companies issuing green bonds is generally worse afterwards. The state is very important, the fight against GHG emissions is a state affair! Government bonds indexed to environmental performance (GHG emissions, deforestation, composite indices) would force governments to meet their commitments, creating a new asset class: sustainability-linked bonds. Private accounting is another lever for private companies at two levels.

The debate mentioned the role of Africa: Tomorrow the major emitters will be South Asia and Africa. By 2050, China will be back to 1 billion inhabitants as will the West. Africa will have 2.4 billion inhabitants and South Asia 2.5 billion. In South Asia, and even less so in Africa, there will not be strong enough states to drive investment. A tripartite partnership in Africa must be set up to make up for the shortcomings of the states. The Chinese and the West could come to an agreement. Africa must become a laboratory for green energy! Investments in Africa should be entirely decarbonised even if, in practice, this adds difficulties. China, in the framework of BIS, could put a price on carbon in its overseas investments, encouraging its partners to do the same. The financial partners – the banks – have clients who have already pushed them out of inaction. For the proposed instruments: the market structure of finance neutralises the power of these instruments.

Download the minutes of the debate in french: Greening Investment Session

 

EU-China Post-Covid-19 Cooperation Forum sessions – 后疫情时代的中欧合作研讨会

The first part of our Forum, co-organised by The Bridge Tank and the Chinese Embassy, brought together 4 former ministers, 5 former ambassadors and a total of 30 experts on 15 October at the Palais Brongniart in Paris, as well as 150 registrants from 3 continents and more than 15 cities, for informed and precise exchanges on economic, industrial, social and cultural issues concerning the EU-China relationship.

Download the programme (in French) here

It was opened by Joël Ruet, Irina Bokova, board member of The Bridge Tank who clarified the expectations for the 6 panels of the Hybrid Forum, and by Ambassador Sylvie Bermann who gave her views and suggestions on the issues to be discussed between the EU and China.

These exchanges will be followed by free contributions via an open online Forum, whose recommendations will provide the material for a “white paper” which will be presented by The Bridge Tank at a restitution conference in the presence of the Chinese Ambassador to France and French and European public figures.

Our work dealt with diplomatic issues, culture, human exchanges, economics and industry, focusing on common challenges between the European Union and China: energy transitions, economic transitions – in particular the advent of new industrial models, global public goods. About 80% of the experts were French or European and 20% Chinese, all independent practitioners.

This forum takes place at an important moment when the European Union and China have started negotiations towards an investment agreement.

The reports of the sessions are available below, after the photo gallery.

Director-General of UNESCO Irina Bokova, Ambassador Sylvie Bermann, Dr. Joël Ruet
Ambassador Stephen Gompertz, Dr. Joël Ruet, Ambassador Geneviève des Rivières, Ambassador Sun Haichao, Emmanuel Dupuy, Dr. Joël Ruet
François Loos, Jean-Claude Beaujour, Fatima Hadj, Alex Wang, Henri de Groussouvre
Cui Wen, Guillaume Henry, Zhao Wei, Nicholas Imbert
Ambassador Philippe Coste, Song Luzhong via Zoom, Pierre-Noël Giraud, Djellil Bouzidi
Director-General of UNESCO Irina Bokova, Hervé Barbaret, Amel Kefif, Wu Peirong, Deborah Furet
Ambassador Philippe Coste, Song Luzheng via Zoom, Edmond Alphandéry
Brune Poirson, Raphaël Schoentgen, Ding Yifan, Thomas Melonio, Dr. Joël Ruet

EU-China Post-Covid-19 Cooperation Forum – Introductory Session

Forum co-organised by The Bridge Tank and the Chinese Embassy in France

The introductory exchanges between Irina Bokova and Sylvie Bermann, former French Ambassador to China, reminded us of the importance of anchoring economic and environmental cooperation in the Sustainable Development Goals, which include the human dimension, and of starting from the concrete in order to arrive at renewed concreteness and make proposals in this direction. The concept of Europe as a “balancing power” proposed by Sylvie Bermann is a common thread in our work.

Balanced power also refers to vision and strategic projection and this concept will be questioned very quickly with the American election, depending on who wins. Combining power and balance is a rather Chinese concept, quite dialectic, will it allow us to avoid falling into the trap of Thucydides? The agenda is moving forward, evolving, and this forum intends to make a modest contribution to the debate.

Irina Bokova, as a board member of The Bridge Tank and former Director-General of UNESCO, wants to give a more ‘UN’ dimension to the debates, to reflect on multilateralism, globalism and the climate. It is a question of rebuilding a fairer, more inclusive and more multilateral world after the crisis of covid. China and the European Union are very important actors in these debates on multilateralism and the United Nations in general. There is currently a refocusing going on in these areas. The European Union’s ambition in this refocusing process is to position itself and find its place in a fully changing world. Seen from the rest of the world, the role of these two powers and their dialogue is extremely important.

The pandemic has shown the interdependence of the world today and the need for cooperation for a more human globalisation, closer to the people – this is also the expectation of European citizens. We must deepen cooperation and continue to reflect on the place of Europe and China, rather than entering into a new geopolitics. It is important to take into account the human and cultural side, not just investments, which allows for rapprochement in the economic, political and security fields.

Sylvie Bermann agreed that it was important to have places where people could express themselves freely and make concrete proposals. This requires an anchoring beyond inter-state relations, which have become a bit frozen and tense with the health crisis. The covid crisis is more a revelation and accelerator of underlying trends than a real renewal. We need to rebuild, but not from scratch: there are geopolitical balances that must be taken into account. The major world powers (US, EU, China) are very different. France is always at the forefront in this area, and President Macron had already formulated elements concerning the autonomy of the EU in his Sorbonne speech. This strategic autonomy is interpreted in different ways. There is European defence and security (not depending on NATO and the US, which tend to turn towards the Pacific and China), but also the question of economic and financial autonomy, hence Europe’s opposition to extraterritorial sanctions: it is not acceptable for another country to dictate what the EU can do or with whom it trades.

Ms Bermann also spoke about the euro, investment, climate, health, education and science.

Joël Ruet closed the introductory session and opened the work of the panels by recalling that the relations between the EU and China also concern the blocks and countries that want to count and have the means to do so (Latin America, Africa for some time now with the 2063 agenda, which outlines the paths of emergence planned for a 40-year horizon).

Download the summary of the debates (in French) here

Download the verbatim report (in French) here

What vision for an innovative, plural and inclusive global governance?


Ambassadors Stéphane Gompertz, Geneviève des Rivières, Sun Haichao, as well as IPSE President Emmanuel Dupuy, discussed with Joël Ruet the role of China and the EU on several global public goods and areas of global governance to work on together, including security and climate, covering also the comparative foreign economic action of these entities in Latin America and Africa, exploring ways and means of cooperation in third countries, notably in Africa.

Some recommendations emerged:

China could play a greater role in the field of political relations, to deal with internal and external conflicts as in the Central African Republic.

At present, China is an observer in the Paris Club: if it were to join, what would be the benefit in terms of common public goods?

China and the EU could cooperate on inclusive governance for the South by supporting the diversification of countries’ economies; the implementation of strategies to transform and diversify exports, adding value, promoting regional trade, entrepreneurship and support for SMEs, and reducing the informal economy.

On several subjects, it seems possible to create partnerships between the EU and China: in the field of international relations, demilitarisation, denuclearisation or on common goods such as biodiversity.

Finally, proposals for the governance of multilateralism were put forward:

China has long adopted a bilateral approach, dealing with international relations on a country-by-country basis rather than via a global approach. It now seems necessary to bring together multilateral working groups, including economic organisations, to deal with these issues and to identify the possibilities for joint work in a well-understood multilateralism, which must also involve poly-governance. Indeed, States cannot be the only decision-makers and thinkers: the various non-state actors have a role to play

Download the summary of the debates (in French) here

Download the verbatim report (in French) here 

What globalisation after Covid-19?

To outline a new vision for Europe and, consequently, the challenges of its relationship with China, François Loos, former French Minister of Industry and Foreign Trade, Fatima Hadj, Member of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s Sustainable Development Goals “Goalkeeper” Community, Alex Wang, Honorary President of the Association Transition Ecologique et Solidaire Française et Chinoise (TESFEC) and Henri de Grossouvre Honorary President of Paris Berlin Moscow met under the leadership of Jean-Claude Beaujour, member of the Board of the Bridge Tank and Vice President of France-Amériques.

Jean-Claude Beaujour noted that the EU has an opportunity to rebalance its global relations, but asks if its governments are ready. Relocation meets a complex reality: what is the business vision of Euro-chinese relations and suggests that it is time to explain to citizens that those on the ground think differently and what the real options are.

François Loos insisted on the necessary restructuring of Europe-China relations, which are too much hampered by bilateral and non-EU relations. Europe must assert itself as a community, and review the mode of governance (going beyond majority voting). For example, photovoltaic production in Europe is compromised by Chinese imports. European producer countries should be favoured. China will have to put in place concrete incentives to enforce the laws in force. Its government has passed a law forbidding unequal treatment of Chinese and foreign companies. But this law is very slow to take hold and to be effective.

Henri de Grossouvre notes that the liberal era (1980-2020) is over. Thus the dogma of non-intervention by the state is being challenged in the EU itself. Example: Massive intervention by the US government. Europe must structure its governance.

Alex Wang believes that Europe-China relations will not stop because of Covid and that two subjects are emerging:

The necessity of rethinking the supply chain to make it more resilient and finding local production solutions.

Rethinking exchanges and collaborations in the field of corporate social responsibility.

Fatima Hadj sees the Covid crisis as exceptional because it impacts all socio-economic areas (unlike 2008 which was purely financial). It raises awareness of the need for economic sovereignty, which must be based on two pillars: management of economic dependence/independence; and finding areas of strategic cooperation, for example the electrification of uses.

Download the summary of the discussion (in French) here

Download the verbatim report (in French) here  

What post-Covid human exchanges?

The issue of human exchanges, whether cultural, educational or scientific, is crucial to envisage the future, especially during this health crisis. Irina Bokova, Hervé Barbaret, Amel Kefif, Wu Peirong and Deborah Furet discussed these issues.

For Irina Bokova, this is an important topic in the debate on the refocusing of relations between Europe and China, especially as China has invested heavily in heritage, culture and identity.

For Hervé Barbaret, new solidarities, new curiosities and new networks must be created.

New solidarities: access to works of art and the sensory experience is unsurpassable. To counter the forms of communitarianism that claim to exclude a large part of humanity from works not produced by their own culture, we must develop a generous universalist approach that does not hierarchize, that allows us to cross our views, to take advantage of the richness of the convergences and divergences in the formal approaches.

New curiosities: the great challenge is that of attractiveness, of taking note of the richness of the cultural offer in the vicinity and of awakening curiosity for this offer.

New networks: the cultural offer is too often in silos, there is a need for a reconciliation of knowledge. Post-covid human exchanges require a decompartmentalized approach which may or may not be based on technological tools.

Amel Kefif underlined the entrepreneurial point of view in relation to the national cooperation committees, which raise for example the question of investments made by the diasporas. The African diaspora develops networks to create cultural projects between Europe and Africa, as well as socio-professional synergies and entrepreneurship support. These projects contribute to the fight against cultural and gender stereotypes. These good practices in cultural exchanges between France and Africa could be duplicated between China and Europe and vice versa. This raises questions about the obstacles and recommendations for directing productive investment between these two powers, and what the debates are for entrepreneurship.

Wu Peirong recalled that technological advances have contributed to progress but social networks create a cultural bubble that contributes to locking people into their subjects, which could reinforce political polarisation as observed in the USA. Technologies are therefore double-edged because they can create cultural walls.

Deborah Furet places these issues in the Chinese philosophical tradition in which the transformation of society does not come through politics, but through the individual, which is not the same as in European culture. In China, the individual is inseparable from others and from nature. This tradition can help to think about societal transformations.

Download the summary of the discussion (in French) here

Download the verbatim report (in French) here 

EU-China: Green development or ecological civilization?

On 14 September, China and European leaders held a summit on an investment agreement. What does the timing of this announcement imply for the climate dialogue? How can we position ourselves in a green dynamism and common ground to give access to these green technologies in all countries? What are the opportunities for companies and industries whose primary goal is to create value?

Wen Cui-Pottier, Guillaume Henry, Zhao Wei and Nicolas Imbert discussed these issues.

The need for law in a perspective of innovation and transition emerged:

Every legal rule can be subject to an ecological analysis. Existing legal rules must be improved by placing them under an ecological prism.
1% of green technology patents are filed in Africa and 3% in Latin America. More than patents, the cause of the technological divide between developed and emerging countries is the know-how that underpins innovation.
Multinationals must be encouraged to collaborate because 70% of patents are filed by large groups that have significant cross-border networks and are the most effective in implementing technologies and knowledge in the countries where they are present.
It also shows that China relies on a competitive and attractive industrial base to develop its green industry. Greening an economy means changing its industry.

China relies on an ambition with three interactive layers: the central government, the active participation of localities, and the investments of Chinese companies.
Chinese companies have an ambitious strategy and are positioned upstream and downstream of the supply chain. They are also present on foreign markets.
China and Europe must enter into a competitive collaboration. Today, Chinese and European companies are actually collaborating while governments are in confrontation.
Finally, two trends complement each other: 1) G. Thunberg’s “How dare?”, which underlines the lack of concrete investment by developed countries in green development, and 2) many effective and agile sectoral initiatives at local level.

Are we in a logic of license to cooperate or of a grey economy to be reinvented? Between green development and ecological civilisation emerges the idea of a possible co-construction with a realistic vision of resilience.

Download the summary of the debates (in French) here

Download the verbatim report (in French) here 

Theme: Overlay by Kaira
Copyright 2020 - The Bridge Tank